Guiding Students to Master Robotics Technology

I spend my Saturdays volunteering at a public library makerspace, the South San Francisco Public Library. I help people operate a few 3D printers, a CNC mill, vinyl cutter, etc. While preparing for my annual RoboGames entry, I thought it’d be cool to teach the library’s patrons about robotics.

I designed a robot kit, partly 3D printed, with electronics that has to be soldered, and running with an Arduino Nano. The three classes are for 3D CAD modelling, soldering, and programming.

The robots are designed to be cheap enough for the library to actually give away. All of my courseware is open source, hosted on GitHub. A lot of the tools and parts were donated by people I know in my professional circles.

Here’s a link to the class content: click here

This blog post is about what I observed, what I did right, what I did wrong.

Day 1 – July 7 2018

Today is the 3D modelling class!

For reference, all the class material used on this date is git hash 31871E2325BAFFEC8535DCAC8AB0131F2227401C. Use this to see what improvements were made to the class content after this date. Click Here to see this particular lesson’s page.

Promotion, Registration, and Attendance

The advertising is mainly from a video on the library’s events page.

(this was done for me by library staff, the video is shown above if you want to see it)

Class size has to be limited to 10. We have enough parts for 10 robots, and 10 soldering irons to work with.

Registration filled up to 10 around June 22 2018. On July 6, we had 18 total registered (8 wait-listed). By class time on July 7, the number shot up to 26. This could be attributed to how infrequently the library holds events that require registration.

6 out of the first 10 people answered my email that contained information regarding how to prepare for the class.

Not everybody showed up, and people who might have showed up may have been waitlisted. 6 kids showed up today.

I will be adjusting how to proceed in the future. As cheap as I can design the robot, obviously there’s still a limit to how much the library can give away.

One parent was actively engaged along with their child (he was having too much fun! actually fools around with the sketching tools, and still got further than some other kids. parent probably knew this and kept him on track once in a while without me knowing). One was napping beside his. The others were either sitting far away enough for me to not notice, or not there at all.

Hilariously bad screw-up on my part

I named the promotional video “promovid_small.mp4”. I just realized my own ad-blocker is blocking it when I view it.

Setup

The preparation suggested people bring their own laptops, 3 people did. The preparation email I sent out also told people to register for an account with Onshape, one did not and registered during the class, another kid was a “walk in” and had trouble registering, so I gave him a pre-fabricated account that I prepared in advance.

This is not a class where I stand in front and talk to everybody at once. Everybody was setup in a circle, and I walked around in circles checking on their progress and helping out when I need to. Everybody was provided with an iPad, which showed the page with the content of the first class. This avoided people needing to ALT-TAB all the time. Nobody had a problem operating an iPad to watch the videos. I didn’t have to really hand-hold anybody! The video format is a success.

All the videos are really short, and on a loop. Check the page itself to see what I mean. Some people preferred to watch the entire clip before executing. Some preferred to pause at each step within a clip. The former tended to accomplish faster than the latter, the latter had a tendency of wondering how to do the next step when the video would’ve shown it if they didn’t pause.

At the beginning of the class, I gave everybody the actual piece of plastic they are designing. I am not sure how much this helped in terms of CADing, but my gut says it was good encouragement.

Total class duration is 2 hours.

Age

The recommended age is 12 and up. Two of them were definitely 10ish. I didn’t really ask. They ranged from shows-up-with-own-laptop-covered-with-NASA-stickers, to … me: “can he use a computer?”, parent: “we try to limit his time”.

A weird observation is that they mostly loved to use the laptop touchpad. We did give everybody a computer mouse, but some of them still preferred the touchpad.

Results

2 out of 6 actually completed everything. They were rewarded by extra parts, 3D printed wheels instead of off-the-shelf. The “homework” is to CAD out that wheel, without full instructions. Since this is Onshape, they are also free to explore the model.

Everybody else at least got to the point where they used almost all the skills I included in the lesson, everything except the last step, which involved linear patterns.

This means these kids all handled dimension, mirroring, coincident constraints, and equality constraints, on top of being able to extrude out shapes and cutting holes into the model. They understand the extrude modes like blind, through-all, and up-to-face.

TinkerCAD can burn in a fire.

If they did not fully finish during the scheduled class time, they are always welcome to come ask me for help while I am volunteering there. Obviously they can also just finish it at home too.

Frequent Problems and Mistakes

These are problems I should have anticipated (some of them are my own fault), and I should make adjustments in the course content to prevent in the future.

The mirroring step needed people to click on a line that overlapped with the edge of a solid. Many people did not click on that line, which resulted in a missing line on the mirrored side. This resulted in an open rectangle that does not extrude. I need to add a reminder to not forget to mirror that line.

There are two sets of holes in the CAD model. Each set of holes is in its own video clip. I put the clip in the wrong order, so many kids were confused where the extra holes came from. I could either reorder the steps or reshoot the videos.

One person made the robot in “landscape”, meaning they swapped width and length. This meant the last step, with the linear pattern, had the pattern going in the wrong direction. This actually teaches them how to use the linear pattern tool a bit more, since it can pattern in two dimensions. I need to add another video clip to show how to fix this mistake.

The constraints toolbar auto-hides itself on a smaller screen, and expands on a bigger screen. This caused one child some confusion. I have added a clarification image to the page about this.

The younger kids tend to follow instructions very verbosely. When I made the video, sometimes I draw a circle in a random position on the screen, random because I intend to add dimensions and constraints to it later. Some kids will draw that circle, in the absolutely exact same position, the exact size, as good as their eyes allows them to see, and ask me if they did it correctly.

The fact that Onshape sort of gives you a chance to dimension an object immediately (the grey text boxes) confuses some people. That grey box does not generate a true dimension constraint.

The plan to have kids help other kids completely failed because of how differently everybody learned and paced. Also people were just plain late to class.

Myself

6 out of 10, doesn’t sound like a lot, right?

I was actually sweating, going around… The video format does work, it would’ve been a LOT worse without the videos.

Next class is 10 kids soldering for the first time in their life, wish me luck.

Prep

The preparation work uses nearly all of my skills, mech, elec, code, web/js, writing, graphics, video, planning, marketing, logistics, etc. The list goes on and on.

Any engineer/CADer would love this next picture

Day 2 – July 14 2018

Today is the soldering and assembly class! (git hash f58d4a93e65082035128776576f01747e5ea00f0)

Click Here to see this particular lesson’s page.

I started setup efforts around 1:30PM, the kids started showing up at around 2PM, and helped me setup. You can tell they were excited to be back. They got started when I was mostly setup and the tools were out. The class had to end at 4:30PM for cleanup.

Although I sent out emails saying there might be extra slots, no extra people showed up. Most of the same attendees from the last class showed up today, with a new additional adult.

While the original class size was capped at 10, it was clear that I was having difficulty keeping up with 5. I actually got overwhelmed enough to deny one “walk-in”, but they didn’t complain, that kid was too young and they knew it. Basically, this event cannot be as much of a “future engineer factory” with just one instructor. (even clean-up alone took slightly more than 30 minutes)

The adult actually pretty much finished the robot. The girl who asked the most questions and needed the most help actually made the best solder joints and got the furthest. Everybody else at least got in a sensor or two.

I missed something major in my instructions… nobody knew which way male pin headers went in! Whether the short side or the long side had to go into the holes. This should be hilarious to anybody who works with electronics, and totally understandable.

With the less time available, I couldn’t show proper technique as much as I should have. A lot of desoldering had to be done as a result. I actually had to teach some interesting desoldering techniques, like how to clear a blocked hole by passing through a wire or pressing the component in while holding the iron to it.

The older kids I simply pointed at the bucket of tools and they just went off mostly guidance-free, grabbing and sharing tools and solder as needed. At one point I even got one to teach another while I was busy…

But That little girl who asked for the most help still beat them in terms of speed and quality (the speed was lost when desoldering came into play). I’d like to find a way for the little girl to adopt the “just try it” attitude but keeping her work ethic, I don’t want somebody with good skills to be simply following orders later in life.

In hindsight, what should have been done is a big demo with all the kids watching me at once, but since everybody showed up at different times and I wanted to maximize time, I just let people start right away. I did do one-on-one demos with everybody but I think it was less effective when it is not pre-planned.

The soldering irons we got had two problems. The metal thread that held the element cover comes loose after becoming hot, but at least the plastic didn’t come loose. The solution was to tighten that nut while the iron is hot. The other problem is that the soldering irons have a firmware bug (or a pseudo feature) where it gets stuck on the lowest temperature setting and stops responding to button presses. Unplug-then-replug fixes it but it happened to multiple people.

I put good effort into making sure everybody was safe. Proper instructions of course, duct-taping the power strips behind each table, making sure first-aid for burns was ready to go. The cord length of the soldering irons posed no problems. There were zero safety incidents today. The soldering mats were actually simple silicone sheets meant for kitchen use, for hot pots and pans. We discovered today that they hold a ton of static charge, you can feel it… like a fuzz feeling when your hand gets close.

One student, aged 12, did try reading my “circuit basics” lesson but was not able to fully understand it. I didn’t actually ask anybody else but that’s one data point. I’d like to get feedback on my interactive circuit demos someday (they are a mix of javascript and animations).

The instructions I wrote actually took 2 months, and 2/3 of that work was wasted. The first robot was built using perfboard, and the entire build was filmed and edited, then realizing the point-to-point soldering of 30 gauge kynar wire would’ve been too advanced of a technique. The second attempt was done using PCB and still using videos, and the length of all the videos, even after editing, would’ve slowed down the class. The 3rd attempt was done using pictures only. It seems ok, the adult student went through it all without asking for any help.

Me: Practice on some cheap perfboard first

When you have been doing something for so long, you don’t truly appreciate just how much of it is not intuitive to other people, until you try to teach them.

July 21 2018

Today was not an officially scheduled class day, but two students still showed up. With enough time for intense 1-on-1 supervision, I made a huge difference in their work quality.

One of them stayed the whole day and even got to programming in the line following algorithm, with no prior knowledge of C++ at all. Holy crap he actually just jumped right in and honest to god he started typing in Python and expected it to work. And since he knew Python but needed semicolons, his code ended up looking like

if (lblack == true); {
    BookWorm.move(600, 0);
}

The sensitivity of the IR phototransistors appears to vary a lot, or maybe it’s the emitter, I can’t quite diagnose it properly.


July 28 2018

Everybody ended up finishing their robot today! Today was scheduled to be the Arduino class but since everybody who showed up still haven’t finished their robot, I busted out the tools again.

The most difficult thing today was somebody soldered in the IR sensors into the wrong side of the board. It’s not possible to desolder the entire part without cutting it to pieces so that’s what we did. In the end, the holes were still damaged, so a drill and wires were involved.

A drill… yes, today power tools were involved. The screws that held in the battery holder are very tight and one youngster simply did not have the hand strength to twist it. I got to amaze people with my DeWalt Gyroscopic Screwdriver. This was a mistake… they all started using it for EVERYTHING, which meant stripped screws and stripped plastic… oops

Annoyingly enough, I had to help somebody install the CH340 drivers on a MacBook and she did not have admin privileges. So at most I let her test her robot using my own laptop. At least we made sure that everything works.

Once again, it was easy to get one kid to help another. I suck at using Macs and I actually delegated the above to another Mac user.

Everybody loves the free swag that my sponsors provided! The screwdrivers especially and unsurprisingly.

August 4 2018

We are coding today! 2 familiar faces + 1 new one showed up. The brightest of the bunch actually got as far as going through the “extra” lesson on how to connect up a IR remote receiver to the robot.

The little girl I had to couch slowly at first, getting her used to cause-and-effect, editing the code that meant to make the robot spin in circles so that it goes in a straight line. I got her used to changing numbers meaning changing speed, how the left and right speeds affect direction, etc. Once she accomplished that, all hell broke loose, she wanted to tape her phone to her robot to record a video from FPV (first person view)…

But it kept toppling over so the next half hour was me and a bunch of kids trying to find a way to keep the robot balanced… We ended up with:

https://youtu.be/IZ4gOt4gLy8

Her cousin also joined the class, starting from lesson 1 on CAD. But these two quickly lost focus and at one point even begged me to take them to McDonalds. They eventually called their parents back, had lunch, and came back with McFlurries in hand.

She was also insanely bothered by the fact that the cheap continuous rotation servos won’t let her robot drive in a perfectly straight line. This is because of component tolerance affecting how the servo driver interprets the lengths of the electrical pulses (my written lessons covers this). To make everybody understand, I asked everybody to count to 10 in their heads, and raise their hands when they reach 10. Of course everybody raised their hands at different times, which was my point, that these cheap servos are bad at interpreting the timed pulses because they are each slightly different.

Obviously nobody would believe me if I told them that no robot can drive in a straight line. I explained a bit about putting rotary quadrature encoders on the wheels, and how it is often impossible for something to do a task perfectly without some sort of way to know that it is not doing the task perfectly, my way of explaining feedback mechanisms and non-idealities.

Getting her back on track, I had to teach how computers make decisions: IF-statements (after I covered serial port debugging to reading sensors). Getting her to write her own code is pretty much impossible because she did not read any books on C++ yet, so I tried another approach. I wrote out a if-elseif-elseif-else block for if whether one, or both, or none of the sensors detect a black line. She knew how to write at least the move(leftspeed, rightspeed); function, so I got her to write that into a blank space in the code first, and then cut-and-paste it inth the appropriate if-blocks.

Mission accomplished, her robot follows a line!

https://youtu.be/eju_QLMyRbs

Weird thing is… whenever I say “I don’t know” to her, she actually hops right into Chrome to ask Google. I guess some people just prefer human interaction whenever possible. Her father is director of software engineering at a near by Silicon Valley company. A busy guy, but he should be able to keep her going at home. I’ve been reporting a lot more of my observations to some of the parents, they are very appreciative.

Party time!

Off topic: behold, USB cables so cheap that I can buy them in a pack of 50 and give them away, but after being yanked on by robots that are coded by a 12 year old

August 12 2018

We did a bit of breadboarding, though… the girl did not read any of the circuit lesson so teaching her was impossible. Her cousin started soldering, she was eager to help.

Once their ability to focus was drained, I let them go nuts with my hot glue gun.

They also spent plenty of time pranking each other, commenting out lines of code… sticking tape underneath computer mice…

Special Thanks: Microchip Technology

A big thanks to Microchip Technology. These guys manufacture the chip in the middle of your Arduino. My professional contacts at their local office generously donated an insane amount of screwdrivers and backpacks. These classes would not have been possible without their help.

Their kindness will not be forgotten. Personally I thank Microchip for jumpstarting my own path in this hobby and career. Microchip Technology is a huge supporter of STEM programs, I definitely have many of their dev kits simply because they handed them out to me in university. Even when I was a poor highschooler, I got started with their PIC microcontrollers because they were essentially free. I truly believe they are the reason why I am insanely good at writing low-level bare-metal embedded firmware. By the time Arduino Diecimila (the first Arduino with USB) was available, I immediately outgrew the Arduino IDE because of just how far using a PIC has pushed me.

Special Thanks: Adafruit Industries

Adafruit Industries is a founding pillar of the maker movement from the very beginning, and a champion for women engineers and entrepreneurs. Limor “Ladyada” Fried and Phillip Torrone (former senior editor at Make: Magazine, Hackaday, Popular Science, Howtoons) donated all the soldering irons we need that makes these classes possible. These irons are the good stuff, coated tips, adjustable ceramic heaters, fire-proof wiring!

As a huge supporter of STEAM education, Adafruit Industries have written literally thousands of guides and tutorials, along side their amazing collection of products that makes it easy for everyday people to accomplish what used to be impossible. How do I know they are so good? I used to work for Adafruit myself, I wrote some of those tutorials and designed some of those products. Even today my real job’s engineering department use their stuff regularly, their breakout boards are just so convenient for quick prototypes. Everything is manufactured proudly on home turf in their New York City office. I recommend all hobbyists to follow their blog, it’s a good mix of electronics, 3D printing, art, and other fun news.

Special Thanks: PCBWay

PCBWay is a speedy and cheap PCB manufacturer and electronics assembly company. They generously provided us with multi-colour PCBs for free, so your robots can be pretty and more unique.

Their service is speedy and at a price that was unheard of before the maker movement took off, making it more accessible to hobbyists and students, allowing the little guys to keep up with the big tech companies. PCBWay also do a lot of community outreach to hobbyists and student teams, hosting contests and offering sponsorships.

Their PCBs are pretty high quality, there’s nothing to complain about. Great looking silkscreen. Soldermask and drills are on point. Edges are milled clean. No splatter with the plating. No hassle using their website to order. Each one of our robot PCBs would cost roughly $3.50 each including shipping, and take one week from time-of-order to your doorstep. Great job PCBWay.

Special Thanks: Silicon Labs

I reached out to people I know at the local Silicon Labs office, and they gave us a big box of goodies to encourage people to participate in STEM programs at our library.

They are a company who manufacture a lot of different microchips, such as the USB interface chips that hobbyists often use to debug the Raspberry Pi and other embedded Linux platforms. If you are into the drone racing hobby, most likely your drone already has four microcontrollers made by Silicon Labs. They’ve been growing rapidly in the past decade and is currently well known for having unique, high performance, and low power products, as well as legacy products that are solid and dirt cheap.

Special Thanks: Hackaday

Hackaday always have a special place in my life, providing me with constant motivation and keeping me up-to-date on both my hobby and professional life. They are literally the biggest reason why I am working a dream job in sunny California. I think their blog is inspirational to everybody here and so they gave me a pile of stickers to give to my class!

They are the host of an excellent online community at Hackaday.io, hosts awesome events such as the Hackaday SuperConference and their Hackaday Prize, and also they run the beloved Tindie where creative makers and hackers can sell their creations.

Related Posts

Upgrading an LC Meter Kit: A DIY Enhancement Project

Upgrade Your Budget LC Meter Kit: A DIY Enhancement Project The HU-053 LC Meter kit is a budget-friendly option for measuring capacitance, inductance, and frequency, available online. With its easy-to-solder components and transparent acrylic enclosure, it’s a great weekend project for electronics enthusiasts. But how accurate is it, and can we make it better? Kit Contents and Assembly The HU-053 kit includes a double-sided PCB, a bag of components, a transparent acrylic enclosure, and all the necessary nuts and bolts for assembly. The assembled device measures 91 × 106 mm with a height of 28 mm, featuring an alphanumeric LCD, a 40-pin STC89C52RC microcontroller, a 3P4T function selection switch, and a ZIF socket for connecting the component to be tested. The unit is powered by a 5-V supply. Improving the LC Meter’s Accuracy After assembling and testing the device, we were disappointed to find that its accuracy was as low as its price. But this presented an opportunity to improve it! In this article, we’ll explore ways to enhance the HU-053 LC Meter’s performance, making it a more reliable measurement instrument. Download the article to learn how to upgrade your budget LC Meter kit and turn it into a useful tool for your electronics projects.

Ultimaker2 Bearing Spool and Bearing Guide Upgrade

This is an upgrade to the Ultimaker2 3D printer for people who have spools that do not fit the original spool holder, and spools that are too tight and thus do not feed smoothly, causing under-extrusion. It is composed of two assemblies: a replacement for the filament guide and a replacement for the spool holder. Both utilizes ordinary skateboard bearings to achieve smooth rotation. The conical shape of the spool holder allows for any sized spool to be used, easily swapped because it uses a wing nut. Files are available on YouMagine. I want to emphasize that I am sharing the STEP files, not just STL, because STL are harder for people to import and modify than STEP files. SolidWorks files are also provided. The cross section images shows you how to assemble the upgrade parts. The screw diameters are #6 for the filament guide and 5/16″ for the spool holder. Please figure everything else out from the cross section images.

Leave a Reply

Related Articles

Accurate EV Power Consumption Measurement: Introducing the LeoINAGPS System

  • August 25, 2024

Upgrading an LC Meter Kit: A DIY Enhancement Project

  • August 25, 2024

Aquarium Computer

  • August 6, 2024
Aquarium Computer

Ultimaker2 Bearing Spool and Bearing Guide Upgrade

  • August 6, 2024
Ultimaker2 Bearing Spool and Bearing Guide Upgrade

3D Printed Battery Recharge Dock for Parrot Rolling Spider

  • August 6, 2024
3D Printed Battery Recharge Dock for Parrot Rolling Spider

Using a Laptop as a Monitor for a Headless Raspberry Pi

  • March 7, 2024
Using a Laptop as a Monitor for a Headless Raspberry Pi